A short but noticeable moment involving Steve Smith and Babar Azam during a Big Bash League (BBL) match drew attention when Smith chose not to take a single on the final ball of the over. The decision, clearly visible on broadcast, quickly became a topic of discussion among fans.
This matters today because end-of-over decisions often reflect match awareness and strategy, especially when elite players are involved.
Key update: what happened on the last ball
On the final delivery of the over, Babar Azam was ready to complete a single. However, Steve Smith signaled and positioned himself to refuse the run, ensuring that he remained on strike for the next over.
The play was legal, calm, and uninterrupted, with no involvement from the umpires.
What led up to this moment
Earlier in the same over:
-
A ball reached the boundary near Babar Azam, who chose not to dive, resulting in four runs
-
Steve Smith, nearby at the time, appeared to expect a stronger attempt
-
Later in the over, Smith himself dived near the boundary, but the ball still went for four
-
Babar was also close during that effort
These back-to-back moments highlighted different fielding decisions, making the final-ball run refusal more noticeable to viewers.
Why refusing the single made sense
From a cricketing perspective, Smith’s choice was tactical:
-
Staying on strike keeps a set batter in control
-
The last ball of an over is commonly used for strike management
-
There was no obligation to complete the run
Such decisions are routine in professional cricket and often go unnoticed unless captured closely on camera.
Who noticed and why it spread
The moment gained attention because:
-
Both players are international cricket stars
-
Broadcast cameras focused on body language
-
Short clips circulated without wider match context
Fans interpreted the scene differently, but the match itself continued smoothly.
Important clarification
-
❌ No argument took place
-
❌ No umpire intervention occurred
-
❌ No post-match comments suggested any issue
The situation remained professional and within the laws of the game.
Expert context
Cricket analysts regularly point out that strike retention at over endings is a fundamental tactic, especially in T20 cricket. Fielding choices near the boundary also depend on risk assessment and player safety, not just effort.
Both players are known for discipline and game awareness.
Quick summary
-
Steve Smith refused a single on the last ball of the over
-
Decision allowed him to stay on strike
-
Earlier boundary moments drew visual attention
-
No official issue or reaction followed
-
Moment reflected game strategy, not conflict
FAQs)
1. Was Steve Smith allowed to refuse the single?
Yes. A batter can legally choose not to take a run.
2. Did Babar Azam react negatively?
No. There was no visible reaction or exchange.
3. Why is this moment being discussed?
Because of camera focus and fan interpretation, not because of an issue.
4. Was any rule broken?
No. The play was fully within cricket laws.
5. Did officials comment on it?
No. There was no official response, as none was required.
Final word
Steve Smith’s decision to refuse a single on the last ball was a calculated cricketing move, shaped by match awareness rather than emotion. In high-level leagues like the BBL, such moments are part of the game’s rhythm.
Not every visible decision signals drama—sometimes it’s just smart cricket.
